Clinical Scenario
Pathological Lesion
Scenario
A 82-year-old male has presented to clinic with increasing right thigh / hip pain. He has no history of trauma and reports weight loss of 1 stone over the past 3 months.
Interview Questions
Please interpret the radiograph and tell me what you are concerned about in this patient?
​
An AP radiograph of the right proximal femur is presented in an 82-year-old male. There is a lytic lesion at the junction of the proximal to middle third of the femur with cortical involvement. There is a narrow zone of transition with no periosteal reaction visible. This lesion is suspicious for a pathological lesion and requires further work up.
​
Key Concerns
-
Atraumatic hip fracture = Needs investigation for pathological fracture
-
Manage as per BOAST: Management of Metastatic Bone Disease [1]
​
What questions would you ask in this patient’s history? How would you examine them?
​
History
-
Pathological lesion Questions
-
Preceding bone pain
-
Weight loss, fevers, night sweats
-
Systems review:
-
Thyroid - Hoarseness? Neck lumps?
-
Breast - Lumps?
-
Lung - SOB? Haemoptysis? Cough
-
Prostate - ?difficulty urinating
-
Kidney - ?haematuria
-
-
-
Previous bisphosphonate usage
-
Past medical history / social history (smoker)
​
Examination
-
NV intact?
-
Thyroid / breast / prostate / kidney / lung examination
-
Inguinal lymphadenopathy
-
Spinal Tenderness
​
Note: These patient's need full oncological history and examination work up. Should examine for 5 common areas for primary bone tumours.
​
What investigations would you order?
​
Investigations
-
Bloods
-
FBC, U&Es, CRP, LFTs, Clotting
-
Bone profile
-
(Raised Alkaline Phosphatase / Hypercalcaemia may raise suspicion of malignancy)
-
-
Thyroid Function Tests (TFTs)
-
Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) + Myeloma screen
-
-
Imaging
-
Xrays
-
Lateral view Hip
-
AP Pelvis
-
Full length-femur
-
-
Specialist imaging:
-
CT CAP​
-
Should be performed within 24 hours (as per BOAST)​
-
-
MRI
-
Bone Scan
-
-
​
If you were suspecting a primary bone tumour, what would you do? What about management if suspecting a secondary bone tumour?
​
Management depends on whether there is a primary or secondary tumour
​
Primary Tumour
-
Refer to regional sarcoma unit
-
Discuss at Multi-Disciplinary Team (MDT) meeting
-
Bone biopsy to be performed at regional centre - usually undertaken by operating surgeon due to risk of seeding tumour along the biopsy track
​
Secondary Tumour
-
Discuss at MDT
-
Is solitary bone metastasis then should be referred to teritary referral unit (as per BOAST)
-
Consider prophylactic fixation (e.g. IM Nailing) if impending fracture
-
Other treatment options include radiotherapy / chemotherapy
​​
What patients should be referred to a tertiary referral unit?
​
As per BOAST guidance on Management of Metastatic Bone disease. The following should have referral onwards to a tertiary referral unit:
​
-
Primary bone tumours - within 72 hours
-
Solitary bone metastases
Metastatic disease without an obvious primary site should be discussed with acute oncology services
​
What are the most common primary sites for metastatic bone lesions? Which of these are classically lytic? Sclerotic? Mixed?
​
Metastatic Disease
Most Common Primary Sites
-
Thyroid
-
Breast
-
Lung
-
Kidney​
-
Prostate
Appearance
-
Sclerotic (blastic) = Prostate
-
Mixed = Breast
-
Lytic = Thyroid / Renal / Lung
​
If a patient had a renal cell carcinoma metastasis, what might you consider prior to surgical fixation?
​
Renal Cell Carcinoma metastases are extremely vascular and pre-operative embolization should be considered to reduce risk of bleeding during fixation
​
What criteria can be used to predict need to perform prophylactic fixation in metastatic bone lesions?
​
Mirels’ Criteria [2]
​
-
Predicts risk of pathological fracture in patients with long bone metastases
-
Can be used to help decision whether to perform prophylactic fixation
-
Consists of four separate criteria with a score of 1-3
-
(3 indicating higher risk of fracture)
-
Addition of 4 criteria numbers gives overall risk
-
-
A score of greater than or equal to 8 = prophylactic fixation
​
What are the aims of surgery in metastatic bone cancer treatment?
​​
-
Survive surgery
-
Allow Immediate full weight bearing
-
Implant should outlive patient
-
Protect entire length of bone
-
Pain relief
"BOAST guidelines recommend that surgery should be consultant-led, aim for long-term durability, and allow immediate weight-bearing.
​
If performing a prophylactic IM nail fixation on this patient - what should be done prior to nail insertion?
​
Venting of the IM canal when performing IM nailing – can reduce the risk of fat embolization
​
Describing a bone tumour on Radiographs
​
-
Location - Which bone? / Where abouts in the bone? (Diaphyseal Vs metaphyseal)
-
Size
-
Transition Zone - Narrow Vs wide
-
Periosteal Reaction
-
Cortical Involvement
-
Matrix Appearance - Osteoid Vs Chondroid
​
What is the definition of subtrochanteric fractures?
​
Definition: Typically defined as an area from the lesser trochanter to 5cm distal to the lesser trochanter
When presented with a subtrochanteric fracture need to exclude:
-
Pathological Fracture OR
-
Bisphosphonate Fracture
​
What are the features of bisphosphonate related fracture on radiographs?
​
Bisphosphonate Related Fractures
-
Around 80% of subtrochanteric fractures are associated with long-term bisphosphonate usage
-
These fractures are associated with increased healing times
-
Fractures fail in tension - starting at lateral aspect of femur - then spreads to medial aspect causing cortical beaking
​
What are the features of bisphosphonate related fracture on radiographs?
​
Classical Features on Radiograph (see images below)
-
Increased cortical thickening
-
Transverse / short oblique fracture orientation
-
Medial Spike = cortical beaking
-
Lack of comminution
​
References
​​
[1] BOA. BOAST- Management of Metastatic Bone Disease. Available online at: https://www.boa.ac.uk/resource/boast-management-of-metastatic-bone-disease.html
[2] Mirels H. Metastatic disease in long bones: A proposed scoring system for diagnosing impending pathologic fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;415:S4-13